Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Bursting Retail Customer Loyalty Myth

Good Article.... Here is the original

Retail Viewpoint - Churn rates should turn grocers' stomachs


Retail Viewpoint - Churn rates should turn grocers' stomachs


Despite all the talk of customer loyalty among the global
grocers some pretty shocking statistics were dished out the other day
that rubbish the claims made by many supermarkets that they are having
a meaningful relationship with their customers.

by Glynn Davis

A
report by Pitney Bowes Group 1 Software on customer churn found that
the supermarkets had experienced the highest growth in customer
defection rates between 2005 and 2007, compared with other sectors,
with an increase from 19.8 per cent to 27.4 per cent - a massive 38 per
cent jump.

The main reasons it cites for churn are - not being
recognised as a valuable customer, unhelpful staff, and ineffective
call centres. It's my guess that all the UK supermarkets would lay
claim to being good in all these areas but these numbers suggest
otherwise.

And guess which country has the greatest churn rates -
Britain. With 22 per cent churn per annum it has the most promiscuous
shoppers in the West. This is put down to things like its crowded
geography and national wealth per capita. But whichever way you cut it
the report is pretty damning of the UK grocers and their inability to
hang on to their customers.

What makes matters worse is that 2008
will possibly show even higher churn rates because we are in the midst
of a great movement of shoppers between the major grocers. Many are
returning to Morrisons after previously losing them to Tesco following
the troubled acquisition of Safeway, Asda has been shouting about its
continued attraction to more upmarket customers, and Waitrose seems to
be tempting people from a broader demographic as it continues to expand
its estate around the UK.

We await with interest next year's
survey but in the meantime try showing a little bit more loyalty to
your friendly local supermarket - as painful as that might be.

Brand value is increasingly about own-brand

Interbrand
published its first 'Top Performing European Retail Brands' report last
week, which ranked the top 25 companies based on various criteria
defined by the branding specialists. In addition to the surprise of
finding that H&M had topped the table was the fact that own-brand
products play a large part in the businesses of many of the
constituents in the list.

A sizeable 60 per cent of the top 25
have own-brand accounting for over 30 per cent of their total revenues
and even more amazing is that three of the top five brands sell only
private label goods - these being H&M, IKEA (in third place) and
M&S in fifth spot. And the other two retailers in the top five -
Carrefour and Tesco - both continue to develop their own-brand offers
with the latter pushing the Tesco name ever-further into non-food
products and services too.

This indicates just how significant a
contribution own-brand product makes to a retailers' overall brand
value and how they are now regarded as a brand weapon. They are also
able to help a merchant create a much clearer value proposition to
customers.

It will be no surprise whatsoever to find that this
trend continues as own label not only makes its presence increasingly
felt within the European retail market but also spreads further into
the US and Asia where it is much less developed.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

http://www.rewardprograms.org/

http://www.rewardprograms.org/






Join a Rewards Program in 3 Easy Steps >>





    • Step 2


    • Compare reward program offers.





    • Step 3


    • Apply for the reward card of your choice





Tuesday, April 8, 2008

CRM 2.0: a Loyalty Marketing Benefit of Web 2.0?

Here are several excerpts from a very interesting article: CRM 2.0: a loyalty marketing benefit of Web 2.0? (free registration required):

The
concept of customer-centricity is evolving, and changes in the business
and social world are already forcing businesses to change the way they
approach management and marketing strategies, says Vladimir Dimitroff
of UK-based Prism Consulting,
who suggests that perhaps the advent of 'Web 2.0' technologies should
naturally lead to the reinvention of CRM systems: 'CRM 2.0', in fact.

What
began as awareness of age-old business principles, brought to
modern-day marketing with critical help from technology, has now
reached a stage where the technology-empowered, connected world is
calling for new approaches in marketing and most other management
disciplines.

The story so far:
The notion of customer
focus dates from ancient times when the small businessman, unknowingly,
practiced CRM in a most natural manner. In modern days, concepts like
relationship marketing emerged in the early 80s but it was only in the
mid-90s when technology propelled these practices into the mainstream
and CRM became a recognised (and, for a while, much hyped) business
discipline.

Since then, CRM has evolved considerably, if
gradually. The software industry rapidly embraced it and made CRM a
class of technology solutions, misleading many to believe that "CRM can
be bought and installed".

Changes for the Customer:
'Customer'
in CRM 1.0 meant it was critical to recognise the importance of
customers for any business, and the fact that they are individuals, not
a grey anonymous mass with 'typical' preferences (statistical averages)
and 'common denominator' needs. The fundamental differences between
'the market' and the customers who inhabit it are yet to be understood
by many business managers, including marketers and even academics. But
today seeing them as individuals is not enough - they are intricately
interconnected with each other, and with the business.

Changes for the Relationship:
It
was originally important to recognise that relationships are two-way.
In the pre-CRM model of 'broadcast' relationships (one-to-many) it was
often said that the customer has a relationship with the brand. But
that was not enough. CRM 1.0 did much to change this, not least with
sales-oriented database technology. Today we recognise that not only
our business has relationships with each customer, but they also are
related to each other in multiple and complex ways.

Loyalty was
(and remains) the ultimate mantra of customer-centric business. Almost
separate from CRM, there is an entire 'loyalty industry', not to
mention scholars and entire academic schools devoted to it. They keep
proving that loyal customers are more profitable, while retention
protects a market share that should translate into shareholder value.
But in today's world of choices hardly any business can command the
total devotion and unconditional loyalty of each customer.

Split loyalties:
There
is a new breed of promiscuity, or 'split loyalty' whereby most
customers persistently satisfy parts of their needs from 2 or more
alternative suppliers.

Changes for the Management:
For
the management of customers, CRM 1.0 dictated that they should be
individually identified, their differences understood, and each one (or
group of similar customers) treated differently from other customers or
groups. This brought the discipline of customer segmentation - one
cannot overstate the importance of understanding how this is different
from market segmentation. Whereas in segmenting markets we distinguish
between groups but are not aware of individual members, in customer
segmentation each individual customer is known to belong to a
particular segment - and, furthermore, is known to exhibit a set of
attributes (with a very individual accuracy, usually a score) that
qualifies him as belonging to a segment.

Good CRM dictates that
this differentiated view is used not only for marketing and service
levels, but in every end-to-end customer process, in planning and
managing the operations and financial returns of the company. CRM 2.0
recognises the complexity and dynamism of customer attributes (even the
same customer A may exhibit a different 'score' when interacting with
his related customer B from the one displayed with related customer C).
The streamlined dimensions of strategic segmentation (usually a
value/needs matrix) become a multidimensional maze that, to make things
even more complicated, pulsates in all directions as dimensions change
with each interaction. To operate successfully in a networked
environment, companies are learning and adopting micro-segmentation -
and linking it to dynamic decisioning in their systems. The discipline
of social network analysis (SNA) is also evolving and some amazing
progress is happening as we speak, as always helped by technology.

With
CRM 2.0 every stakeholder has become an intermediary - to continue the
trend of coining 'clever' wording, I might call it poly-intermediation
or multi-intermediation. In a viral or WoM (word-of-mouth) campaign a
company has as many intermediaries as it has been able to reach through
those all-important connected influencers.

Web 2.0 dies without CRM 2.0...
Dimitroff
believes that the much-hyped Web 2.0 is the enabling platform but that
it cannot be a successful model in itself unless it also embraces CRM
2.0 principles. Understanding this will make all the difference in the
imminent shrinking of the 'Web 2.0 industry' at the tail of the hype
cycle (perhaps not a dot-com-like implosion, but some correction is
definitely to be expected soon).

In a press release about a
recent acquisition of a UGC web site, a marketing executive declared
"We enter the social networks arena because it's a powerful way to get
our message across". But communities don't really want powerful
messages. Instead, marketers should be inside the networks to listen,
not to shout... and, just occasionally, to whisper in the right ears.

Dimitroff's
advice to would-be CRM 2.0 practitioners is to keep building the
remaining parts of CRM 1.0. But while they build, there's nothing to
stop them from adopting low-cost (and low-risk) CRM 2.0 methods and
techniques.

For much more detail, check out the complete source article.

Web 2.0 can help you drive Loyalty

(Original Article: By Joe Lichtenberg
Customer engagement drives loyalty and the effective use of Web 2.0 drives customer engagement.

If you're like most marketers, you'll agree that loyalty pays. The statistics that a brand should focus on its most loyal customers are compelling:

  • An increase of customer loyalty of 1 percent is equivalent to a 10 percent cost reduction (source: Bain & Co.)
  • The probability of selling to a new prospect is only 5 percent to 20 percent while the probability of selling to an existing customer is 60 percent to 70 percent (source: Marketing Metrics)
  • Customer loyalty accounts for 38 percent of margin, 40 percent of revenue growth and 38 percent of shareholder value (source: Accenture Research).

Despite these findings, a just released report by Strativity Group found that although respondents declare that customer loyalty strategies are more important than they were three years ago, a full 60 percent of senior executives claim they do not deserve their customers' loyalty! "Respondents honestly admitted that they are selling commodities and that their core value proposition does not merit customer loyalty," says Lior Arussy, company founder.

What should these executives be doing to deserve the loyalty of their customers?

Customer engagement drives loyalty, and effective (and judicious) use of Web 2.0 drives customer engagement. Marketers that embrace these technologies and integrate the new brand/customer dynamic into their strategies will engender the loyalty of the customers. And as Web 2.0 and social networking tools and technologies move even further into the mainstream, marketers that don't go down this road may be left behind, doomed to compete based solely on price.

Here are the four new laws of customer loyalty in today's Web 2.0 world:

Loyalty Law #1: Drive community participation
Loyalty Law #2: Don't just talk to customers … listen.
Loyalty Law #3: Meet customers' expectation of honesty.
Loyalty Law #4: Reward your best users

Loyalty Law #1: Drive community participation



People naturally congregate around common passions or interests.
Connecting and interacting with others who feel the same way and who
share common experiences creates stronger bonds. Savvy marketers use
this level of participation as the foundation of their online
communities and as a cornerstone of their loyalty efforts.
In a report titled "The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs,"
Paul Dholakia, an assistant professor of management at the Jesse H.
Jones Graduate School of Management, said that it's not a matter of
attempting to directly influence consumers, but of providing them
support in interacting with each other through activities of their
brand community, which, in turn, increases their level of engagement
and loyalty."
Loyal customers already have an affinity for a brand's products or
services, and they will instinctively be drawn to a brand's online
community. Customers who are strongly engaged in the brand community
are more likely to remain attached to the group, participate in group
activities more often, and recommend the brand community to
non-members. What's more, research shows that customers who are engaged
in an online community stay longer and buy more. According to the
Ogilvy Loyalty Index, such customers can be worth up to six times the
value of an average customer.
In addition to driving loyalty, inviting customers to participate in
the brand is an effective marketing research tool. After all, who knows
how to best market to your target market than your target market
itself?


Loyalty Law #2: Don't just talk to customers … listen

Faced with a deluge of marketing messages, increasing resistance and
negativity towards advertising and marketing in general, and a growing
array of communication channels, the conversation between the brand and
customer must change. A one-way, marketing-driven conversation no
longer engages customers. Building trust and earning loyalty is the act
of creating a dialogue with customers: talking, sharing and, above all
else, listening.
Marketers have at their fingertips an array of technologies (such as
blogs, forums, chat rooms and online communities) to facilitate
conversations with their customers. Being able to easily contribute
opinions and ideas connects the customer to the brand, but what
strengthens this relationship is when the brand embraces the customer
as a partner in the dialogue, and truly listens to what he/she has to
say, and acts on it. In fact, experts say that the very act of
listening deepens customer loyalty.
Ducati, the Italian motorcycle company, is putting customer-driven
innovation and participation at the crux of its marketing efforts.
Ducati engages its customer community to provide feedback on design,
performance and general customer experience. Blogs have replaced formal
research methods, and through new media communication tools, Ducati is
embracing its customer community in an ongoing, real-time, informal
feedback loop. In fact, the company now calls itself a tribe of
employees and customers who share emotions and fight together.

Loyalty Law #3: Meet customers' expectation of honesty.

Delivering consistently on the brand promise plays a greater role in
creating loyal customers than any other customer-facing capability,
accounting for one-third of an organization's ability to achieve high
customer loyalty, according to marketing and customer management
research by Accenture. In fact, for all companies in the study,
regardless of their industry or business model (i.e.,
business-to-consumer, business-to-business, et cetera), developing and
delivering a branded customer experience comprises 33 percent of a
company's ability to achieve strong customer loyalty.
How does social media affect customers' expectations of the brand?
In the Web 2.0 world, consumers look for different traits from brands.
While on one hand customers expect that the brand will deliver a
quality product or service, the new brand/customer dynamic also raises
the expectation that brands will behave a certain way online. In the
realm of social and user-generated media, brands must be honest about
their opinions and their identity.
As Max Kalehoff writes in his blog, consumer-generated marketing
means "entering into direct conversations with consumers, where there
is a far greater expectation of humanness, honesty and transparency." I
believe that the best rule of thumb is to follow the WOMMA (Word of
Mouth Marketing Association) Ethics Code Honesty ROI:
  • Honesty of Relationship: You say who you're speaking for
  • Honesty of Opinion: You say what you believe
  • Honesty of Identity: You never obscure your identity
Loyalty Law #4: Reward your best users

Information, how you want it, when you want it: By serving community
members and customers with useful and informative content delivered
regularly, marketers can drive loyalty and enhance brand value at the
same time. Delivering valuable information is an easy way to create a
relationship based on trust. To drive loyalty, optimize content
delivery and discovery, make it easy for customers to find and access
this information, and share it with others. And, this means giving
links and feeds that are relevant to the customer, even if they are not
the brand's content.
Brands can also use content to extend their current loyalty
initiatives: for instance, by offering premium content, special
promotions, or access to exclusive information, chats, and forums to
loyal customers.
While some may believe that customer loyalty is waning in response
to the transparency of the web, Web 2.0 actually gives marketers an
exciting new set of tools to add to their portfolio to help improve it!
And these loyalty laws help marketers do exactly that, and drive bottom
line results.

Frequent flyer programs — cash cow for airlines

An article in the International Herald Tribune (and New York Times)
says that: "Many airlines around the world earn hundreds of millions of
dollars a year
by selling miles to partners like credit card companies
and hotel chains. Those companies, in turn, give the miles to customers
as sign-up bonuses or rewards for hotel stays. That revenue is critical
for the airlines in an era of escalating fuel prices, but it has also
changed frequent-flyer programs into more complex businesses, where
flyers are just one of the constituencies carriers are trying to
please."

InsideFlyer’s Randy Peterson, quoted in the article,
says, "The real change over the years has been the evolution from being
a loyalty program for the airline’s best customers to today being
a currency program for anybody’s best customers."


Interesting bits from the article:


  • 15-20 percent of miles are being redeemed for non-airline rewards
    (four years ago, that figure was less than 5 percent)
  • Miles earned continues to outpace award-seat capacity
  • The going price for a mile to outside issuers: 1-3 cents
  • Outstanding miles from three major airlines as of EOY 2007: upwards of 1.5 trillion (613 billion at American Airlines’ AAdvantage, 510 billion at Delta’s SkyMiles, 488 billion at United’s MileagePlus)
  • American’s AAdvantage net in 2007: 50 billion unredeemed miles (200 billion issued, and 150 billion redeemed)

For more frequent-flyer program statistics/facts, see our article.


http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/04/01/business/frequent.php


  • What began 27 years ago as a way to win the loyalty of travelers has turned into a lucrative business for the airlines.
  • The best snapshot of a loyalty program's performance comes from
    Aeroplan, a business that Air Canada spun off in 2005. It now operates
    as a publicly traded trust, and it reported earnings of $185 million
    last year on revenue of $926 million. The success of the Aeroplan
    spinoff has put pressure on other carriers to consider a similar
    strategy.
  • Last year, Qantas, Delta, United, Northwest and American expressed
    interest in exploring that option, although with high oil prices and
    merger talks, the consensus is that no carrier in the United States is
    likely to spin off its frequent-flier program in the near future.
  • "We're at a turning point," said Jeff Robertson, managing director for
    Delta's SkyMiles program. He said its members earned 27 percent more
    miles in 2007 than in 2004, yet the capacity allocated for award seats
    remained flat.
  • While most carriers have customarily been tight-lipped about how much
    they earn from these programs, more details are starting to emerge.
    United reported revenue of $800 million last year from selling miles,
    while Qantas earned $218 million in the last half of 2007 from mileage
    sales to third parties.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

AMR: Retail Loyalty Program Roadmap: Strategy, Best Practices, and Technology Options






The Retail Enhanced Loyalty Program Roadmap: Strategy, Best Practices, and Technology Options





Most retailer loyalty programs are not optimal. Because of this, a
majority of retailers with loyalty programs plan to revamp them over
the next two years. Whether enhancing an existing program or looking to
implement one for the first time, this Report provides a detailed
roadmap, highlights field-tested industry best practices, and outlines
the software marketplace to guide retailers along their journey.



AMR Research clients, please login.

This
document is available to AMR Research clients only. If you would like
further information about how to become a client, please contact info@amrresearch.com.